Cost vs Benefit: When Expensive Medications Make Sense Despite Side Effects

Cost vs Benefit: When Expensive Medications Make Sense Despite Side Effects
16 November 2025 14 Comments Liana Pendleton

Drug Value Assessment Tool

Value Assessment Calculator

This tool helps you evaluate whether an expensive medication might be worth the cost based on the key factors discussed in the article.

%
$

Your Assessment Result

Note: This tool provides a general assessment based on the article's framework. Always consult with your healthcare provider and financial counselors for personalized advice.

Find Financial Assistance

When a $500,000 treatment is the only real choice

Imagine your doctor says the only drug that might save your life costs half a million dollars. It comes with a 30% chance of severe fever, low blood pressure, and a hospital stay. Your insurance won’t cover it all. You’ll still owe $20,000. You’ve tried everything else. Nothing worked. What do you do?

This isn’t science fiction. It’s real life for people with certain cancers, rare genetic disorders, and autoimmune diseases. In 2024, the average cost of the 50 most expensive drugs in the U.S. was over $16,000 per dose. Some, like CAR-T cell therapies, cost nearly half a million dollars per treatment. And yet, for thousands of patients, these drugs are the only thing standing between them and death.

Why do we pay so much? And when does the price actually make sense-even when the side effects are brutal?

It’s not just the price tag-it’s what you’re trading for

Most people think expensive drugs are just overpriced. But that’s not the whole story. The real question isn’t how much it costs. It’s what you’re getting in return.

Take hepatitis C. Before 2014, treatment meant weekly injections of interferon for up to a year. Side effects? Severe fatigue, depression, flu-like symptoms, and a 50% cure rate. Today, a 12-week course of Harvoni cures 95% of patients with almost no side effects. The upfront cost? $7,153 out-of-pocket for many in 2016. But compared to the old treatment? It was a no-brainer. No more missed work. No more hospitalizations. No more lifelong liver damage.

That’s the pattern. Expensive drugs often replace treatments that are cheaper but far worse. They don’t just extend life-they restore it. A patient with hemophilia who used to bleed into joints every month can now take a weekly pill and live without pain. A child with spinal muscular atrophy, once expected to die before age two, is now walking because of a $2.1 million gene therapy.

Side effects matter. But sometimes, the alternative is worse.

Why do these drugs cost so much? The real reasons

Pharma companies say they need high prices to recoup research costs. The Tufts Center estimated $2.6 billion to bring a new drug to market. But here’s the catch: that number includes failed drugs, marketing, and profit margins-not just R&D.

More importantly, many ultra-expensive drugs aren’t truly groundbreaking. A 2023 analysis by Prescrire International found only 7 out of 100 new drugs offered major progress over existing ones. Yet they still sold for six-figure prices.

So why do they cost so much? Three big reasons:

  1. Orphan drug incentives. The 1983 Orphan Drug Act gave companies 7 years of market exclusivity for drugs treating rare diseases (under 200,000 U.S. patients). That’s great for innovation-but it lets companies charge whatever they want. Of the 50 most expensive drugs in 2024, 72% were for rare conditions.
  2. No price controls in the U.S. Unlike Canada, Germany, or the UK, the U.S. doesn’t negotiate drug prices for most patients. Medicare can’t bargain until 2026, and even then, only 10 drugs are targeted. The rest? Manufacturers set the price.
  3. Rebates hide the real cost. The list price you see? It’s not what insurers pay. Drugmakers give huge rebates to pharmacy benefit managers, but patients still pay based on the inflated list price. That’s why someone with good insurance might pay $500 a month, while a Medicare beneficiary without subsidies pays $5,000 for the same drug.

The system isn’t broken because companies are greedy. It’s broken because there’s no real standard for what a drug is worth.

A child transforms from frail illness to standing strong, symbolized by a golden therapeutic bridge.

How doctors and insurers decide: The QALY test

Outside the U.S., countries like the UK and Germany use something called the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to decide if a drug is worth buying.

One QALY = one year of perfect health. If a drug extends life by 2 years but with poor quality (pain, fatigue, frequent hospital visits), it might only count as 1.2 QALYs.

The UK’s NICE says a drug is worth it if it costs under £30,000 per QALY. If it costs £120,000 per QALY? It gets rejected-unless the manufacturer lowers the price. That’s how daratumumab, a multiple myeloma drug, went from denied to covered: the price dropped from £120,000 to £45,000 per QALY.

In the U.S., there’s no official limit. But hospitals and insurers use similar math behind the scenes. If a cancer drug costs $200,000 and adds 4 months of decent life? That’s $600,000 per QALY. Most payers won’t cover that unless the patient has no other options.

It’s cold math. But it’s the only tool we have to stop companies from charging $1 million for a drug that adds 3 weeks of life.

When side effects are worth it: Real patient stories

One Reddit user, a 42-year-old with rheumatoid arthritis, wrote: "I took Humira for 5 years. Got shingles twice. Lost 15 pounds from nausea. But I went from using a cane to hiking again. Worth it."

Another, a mother of a child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: "The drug costs $300,000 a year. We have to apply for help every 6 months. We skip meals sometimes. But my son can still hug me. He’s not in a wheelchair yet. That’s more than we had two years ago."

And then there’s CAR-T therapy. A 68-year-old with advanced lymphoma, after three rounds of chemo failed, got tisagenlecleucel. The treatment cost $475,000. He spent 10 days in the hospital with high fever and confusion. But 18 months later? No cancer. No chemo. No more scans.

These aren’t outliers. In a 2023 ASCO patient survey, 78% of people who got CAR-T therapy said it was "worth the cost," even with the side effects. Why? Because they were out of options.

Side effects don’t make a drug bad. They make it human. And sometimes, human enough to live.

How to get these drugs without going broke

Knowing a drug is worth it doesn’t help if you can’t afford it. Here’s how real people get access:

  • Manufacturer patient assistance programs. Most big drugmakers offer free or discounted drugs to low-income patients. On average, they cover 40% of out-of-pocket costs for commercially insured people.
  • Nonprofit foundations. Groups like the Chronic Disease Fund and Patient Access Network Foundation gave out $2.1 billion in help in 2022. Apply early-it takes time.
  • Medicare Part D has a catastrophic coverage phase. Once you hit $8,000 out-of-pocket in 2024, you pay only 5% for the rest of the year. Many patients don’t realize this kicks in after months of paying thousands.
  • Specialty pharmacies. These aren’t your local CVS. They assign case managers who handle prior authorizations, appeals, and financial aid. They spend 3+ hours per patient. Use them.
  • Ask for a price match. Some hospitals negotiate bulk discounts. If your neighbor got the same drug for $10,000 less, ask your doctor to call the manufacturer. It works more often than you think.

Don’t assume you can’t afford it. The system is stacked against you-but it’s not impossible.

A patient reaches for a .1M pill as shadowy corporate figures loom behind them in a pharmacy.

The future: Will we ever fix this?

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 finally lets Medicare negotiate prices for 10 drugs starting in 2026. That’s a start. But 96% of the most expensive drugs are still off-limits because they’re too new, too rare, or too complex.

Europe is moving faster. By 2025, all new drugs there will be reviewed jointly by 10+ countries for both safety and value. The U.S. is still stuck in a patchwork of private insurers, hospital systems, and pharmacy benefit managers.

But change is coming. More insurers are using independent groups like ICER to evaluate drug value. In 2022, only 12% of new drugs were reviewed by these groups. By 2027, that could jump to 35%.

The goal? Stop paying $500,000 for a drug that adds 2 months of life. Start paying $100,000 for one that gives you 5 years.

Patients shouldn’t have to choose between their health and their home. But until the system catches up, that’s still the reality for too many.

When expensive drugs make sense: The checklist

Not every expensive drug is worth it. Here’s how to tell if yours is:

  1. Did it work when nothing else did? If you’ve tried 3+ alternatives and failed, this drug might be your only shot.
  2. Is the side effect profile better than the old treatment? Even if this drug causes nausea, if the old one caused liver failure? It’s a win.
  3. Does it improve daily life? Can you work? Sleep? Play with your kids? That’s more valuable than just living longer.
  4. Have you checked financial help? Don’t say no until you’ve talked to a case manager or applied for aid.
  5. Is there a cheaper alternative with similar results? Sometimes generics or biosimilars exist. Ask your pharmacist.

If the answer is yes to the first three, and you’ve explored help options? The cost might be worth it.

What’s next if you’re considering an expensive drug

Start here:

  1. Ask your doctor: "Is this the best option, or just the newest?"
  2. Call the drugmaker’s patient support line. They have counselors who help with paperwork.
  3. Search for your drug + "patient assistance program"-most have one.
  4. Ask your insurer for a prior authorization appeal form. Many approvals get denied the first time.
  5. Join a patient advocacy group for your condition. They know the tricks.

You don’t have to fight alone. The system is broken-but people are finding ways through it every day.

14 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    mike tallent

    November 17, 2025 AT 09:04
    I've seen this firsthand with my sister's CAR-T treatment. She was dying. Now she's hiking. The $475K? Worth every penny. 🙌 No regrets, just gratitude.
  • Image placeholder

    Joyce Genon

    November 18, 2025 AT 20:55
    Let’s be real - this whole system is a rigged casino. Pharma companies don’t invent cures, they invent monopolies. The $500K drug? It’s not medicine, it’s extortion dressed in a lab coat. And don’t get me started on how they use orphan drug laws like a cheat code. You think that’s innovation? Nah. That’s capitalism with a stethoscope.
  • Image placeholder

    John Wayne

    November 19, 2025 AT 10:11
    The QALY metric is the only rational framework we have. Anything else is emotional blackmail masquerading as ethics. If a drug costs $1M per QALY and adds 12 weeks of moderate discomfort, it shouldn’t be covered - regardless of how tear-jerking the patient story is. Sentiment doesn’t pay the bills, and neither should it pay for drugs.
  • Image placeholder

    Robert Merril

    November 19, 2025 AT 13:06
    Most people dont get that the list price is a lie. Insurers pay way less but patients get stuck with the inflated number because of how rebates work. Its a shell game. And yeah the orphan drug act was meant to help small companies but now its just Big Pharma playing the system. Also typo: 'recoup' not 'recooup' lol
  • Image placeholder

    Noel Molina Mattinez

    November 20, 2025 AT 15:30
    I know a guy who got the $2M gene therapy for SMA his kid is walking now but they had to sell their house and his wife works two jobs. No one talks about that part. The system is broken but people still try. Thats the real story
  • Image placeholder

    Roberta Colombin

    November 22, 2025 AT 13:37
    I want to say thank you to everyone who shared their stories. It takes courage to talk about this. No one should have to choose between their health and their home. We need to do better. Compassion and policy must go hand in hand. You are not alone.
  • Image placeholder

    Julie Roe

    November 23, 2025 AT 09:04
    I read this whole thing and honestly I just feel exhausted. The system is so complex that even people who are educated and have good insurance get lost. I had to help my aunt navigate her multiple myeloma drug last year. We spent 14 hours on the phone. We got it approved after three denials. And still, she paid $8,000 out of pocket before the catastrophic cap kicked in. Nobody tells you that part. The emotional toll is just as heavy as the financial one. I wish there was a map. There should be a national helpline. Not just for the rich or the lucky.
  • Image placeholder

    jalyssa chea

    November 24, 2025 AT 08:46
    If you cant afford it you should just die its not that hard like why are we even having this convo the drugs are expensive because they work and if you cant pay then you dont deserve to live maybe we should stop pretending this is about healthcare and admit its about who can afford to live
  • Image placeholder

    Gary Lam

    November 26, 2025 AT 05:53
    I used to think these prices were insane until my cousin got the CAR-T. Now I get it. You don’t think about cost when your kid’s breathing is fading. But yeah, the system’s a mess. Pharma’s not evil - they’re just the only ones with the keys. And we’re all locked out. 😅
  • Image placeholder

    Peter Stephen .O

    November 26, 2025 AT 18:09
    This isn’t just about drugs. It’s about dignity. When you’re told your life is worth $600K per QALY and you’re still fighting to breathe - you realize the system doesn’t see you as a person. It sees a spreadsheet. But we’re more than numbers. We’re moms who hug. Dads who play catch. Grandpas who hike. And if that’s not worth paying for, then what the hell are we even doing here?
  • Image placeholder

    Andrew Cairney

    November 27, 2025 AT 19:00
    You know who really profits from this? The insurance companies. They get paid to deny. The drugmakers? They just play along. The government? They’re asleep. This whole thing is a coordinated scam to funnel money into private equity firms. I’ve seen the SEC filings. The real cost of these drugs? $12K. The rest? Profit laundering. Wake up people.
  • Image placeholder

    Rob Goldstein

    November 29, 2025 AT 01:26
    From a clinical perspective, the real value isn’t in the drug - it’s in the care ecosystem around it. The case managers, the specialty pharmacies, the psychosocial support - that’s what makes these therapies work. The $500K isn’t just for the vial. It’s for the 60-person team that makes sure you survive the infusion. Most people don’t realize that. We need to decouple the cost of the molecule from the cost of the delivery system.
  • Image placeholder

    vinod mali

    November 29, 2025 AT 06:14
    In India we have no access to these drugs. My friend’s daughter has SMA. She can’t walk. We cry every night. But we are lucky if we can afford insulin. This post made me feel so helpless. I wish the world could see how unfair this is.
  • Image placeholder

    Jennie Zhu

    November 29, 2025 AT 10:38
    The ethical imperative to provide access to life-sustaining therapeutics must be balanced against the fiscal sustainability of the healthcare system. The absence of a universal cost-effectiveness threshold in the United States results in significant inequities in care delivery. It is imperative that policymakers institute transparent, evidence-based pricing mechanisms informed by robust health economic analyses to ensure both innovation and equity.

Write a comment