Specialty Pharmacy and Generics: Key Practice Challenges and Patient Considerations

Specialty Pharmacy and Generics: Key Practice Challenges and Patient Considerations
26 January 2026 4 Comments Liana Pendleton

When a patient starts a specialty medication for multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or hepatitis C, they’re not just getting a drug-they’re entering a complex system of care. These drugs often cost over $1,000 a month, require refrigeration, special injections, and constant monitoring. And while generics promise big cost savings, their use in specialty pharmacy isn’t as simple as swapping a brand-name pill for a cheaper one in a community setting.

What Makes Specialty Pharmacy Different?

Specialty pharmacy isn’t just about high-cost drugs. It’s about managing drugs that demand precision. These are often biologics-large, complex molecules made from living cells-used for chronic, life-altering conditions. Unlike a generic blood pressure pill, a specialty drug like Humira or Enbrel can’t be easily copied. Even when generics appear, they come with unique hurdles.

Traditional pharmacies fill 90%+ of prescriptions with generics. Specialty pharmacies? Often less than 10%. Why? Because most specialty drugs still don’t have generics. But that’s changing. With patents expiring on blockbuster biologics, biosimilars-generic-like versions of biologics-are flooding the market. As of December 2023, the FDA had approved 35 biosimilars. The first interchangeable one, Semglee for insulin, hit shelves in 2021. That’s a game-changer.

Generics vs. Biosimilars: Not the Same Thing

Let’s clear up a big confusion. A generic for a small-molecule drug like metformin is chemically identical to the brand. A biosimilar for a biologic like Humira isn’t identical-it’s highly similar. Because biologics are made from living cells, even tiny differences in manufacturing can affect how they behave in the body. The FDA requires biosimilars to prove they work the same way with no clinically meaningful differences in safety or effectiveness. But they’re not automatic substitutes.

That’s why substitution rules vary. For traditional generics, pharmacists can switch without asking the doctor-unless state law says otherwise. For biosimilars, substitution depends on whether the FDA has labeled them “interchangeable.” Only then can a pharmacist switch a patient without prescriber approval. Most biosimilars still aren’t interchangeable. That means every switch needs a new prescription. It adds paperwork, delays, and confusion.

Why Pharmacists Are Stressed About Generic Substitution

Specialty pharmacies are caught between two pressures: saving money and keeping patients safe. On one hand, switching a patient from a $78,000-a-year brand drug like Copaxone to its $45,000 generic glatiramer acetate saves thousands. On the other, patients report side effects after switching between generic manufacturers-even for the same drug.

A 2022 survey of specialty pharmacy staff found that 78% saw managing patient concerns about generics as a major workflow issue. Why? Because generics look different. The color, shape, or markings change with each manufacturer. Patients think they got the wrong medicine. They panic. They call the pharmacy. They stop taking it.

Worse, for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index-like levothyroxine or warfarin-tiny changes in blood levels can cause serious harm. Patients switched between generic brands of levothyroxine have reported fatigue, weight gain, or heart palpitations, even though labs say the levels are “in range.” Pharmacists know the science says it’s bioequivalent. But patients feel different. And feeling different matters.

Pharmacist explaining biosimilar differences to patients with glowing medical diagrams in the background.

PBMs Are Making It Harder

Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) control reimbursement and formularies. They want high generic dispensing rates. But specialty pharmacies often can’t meet those targets because many drugs have no generic. Still, PBMs penalize them anyway.

Some PBMs track a metric called the Generic Dispensing Ratio (GDR). If a specialty pharmacy’s GDR is too low-even if it’s because there are no generics available-they face financial penalties. That’s like fining a bakery for not selling gluten-free cakes when they don’t have the ingredients.

And reimbursement? It’s broken. Many specialty pharmacies buy drugs at one price, but get reimbursed less by PBMs. Some get paid below acquisition cost. That’s not sustainable. It forces pharmacies to cut corners-or shut down.

How to Handle Generics the Right Way

There’s no one-size-fits-all. But here’s what works:

  • Start with high-volume, high-cost therapies. Focus on drugs like glatiramer acetate, infliximab, or rituximab where generics or biosimilars are available. Don’t try to swap everything at once.
  • Standardize your inventory. Pick one generic manufacturer per drug when possible. Avoid juggling five different versions of the same drug. It reduces errors and confusion.
  • Document patient-specific risks. Does the patient have an allergy to a dye or filler in one generic? Track it. Flag it. Don’t assume all generics are the same.
  • Build a substitution protocol. When switching, get prescriber approval. Document the reason. Notify the patient in writing. Follow up in 30 days.
  • Monitor closely for NTI drugs. For drugs like levothyroxine or cyclosporine, check blood levels before and after a switch. Don’t just rely on patient reports.

Patients Need Better Education

Most patients don’t understand the difference between a brand, a generic, and a biosimilar. They hear “same drug” and assume it’s identical. It’s not.

Specialty pharmacists must spend time explaining:

  • Why the pill looks different
  • Why a biosimilar isn’t an exact copy
  • Why switching might cause side effects-even if labs say it’s fine
A 2014 study on MS patients showed that with good medication therapy management, adherence jumped from 33% to 60%. That’s not magic. That’s counseling. That’s follow-up. That’s trust.

Pharmacist overwhelmed by paperwork and PBM penalties under a flickering light at night.

The Future: Biosimilars Are Here to Stay

Humira biosimilars launched in the U.S. in 2023 after years of legal battles. More are coming. The Congressional Budget Office estimates biosimilars could save the U.S. $54 billion over ten years. But savings won’t happen unless patients and providers trust them.

Specialty pharmacies are on the front lines. They’re the ones educating patients, managing supply chains, and navigating PBM rules. They’re also the ones catching the problems-like a patient who developed hives after switching biosimilar brands.

The key is transparency. If a patient is switched to a biosimilar, they should know:

  • What it is
  • Why they’re being switched
  • What to watch for
  • Who to call if something feels off

Final Thought: It’s Not About Cost-It’s About Care

Generics and biosimilars aren’t villains. They’re tools. Used right, they can make life-changing treatments affordable. Used wrong, they can break trust, harm patients, and strain staff.

Specialty pharmacy isn’t just filling prescriptions. It’s managing complex lives. The goal isn’t to maximize generic rates. It’s to ensure every patient gets the right drug, at the right time, with the right support. That’s the real specialty.

Can a pharmacist automatically substitute a biosimilar for a brand-name biologic?

Only if the FDA has designated it as "interchangeable." Most biosimilars are not interchangeable, meaning a new prescription from the prescriber is required before substitution. Even for interchangeable biosimilars, state laws may require the prescriber to be notified or the patient to consent.

Why do generic drugs look different from the brand name?

Generic drugs must have different inactive ingredients-like dyes, fillers, or coatings-to avoid trademark infringement. These changes affect color, shape, or markings but not how the drug works. However, patients often mistake these differences for a different medication, leading to confusion or refusal to take it.

Are all generic drugs the same quality?

All generics must meet FDA standards for bioequivalence and manufacturing. But different manufacturers may produce versions with varying levels of consistency. Some clinicians and pharmacists report more side effects with certain generic brands, especially for narrow therapeutic index drugs. Tracking which manufacturer a patient responds to-and sticking with it-is a best practice.

Why are specialty pharmacies penalized for low generic dispensing rates?

Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) often use a Generic Dispensing Ratio (GDR) to measure performance. But many specialty drugs have no generic alternative. Penalizing pharmacies for not meeting GDR targets in these cases ignores clinical reality and creates financial strain. Specialty pharmacies are increasingly pushing back, demanding fair metrics based on actual drug availability.

What should a specialty pharmacy do when a patient reports side effects after switching to a generic?

First, don’t dismiss the concern. Even if labs show bioequivalence, patient-reported outcomes matter. Review the patient’s history: Did they switch manufacturers? Are they on a narrow therapeutic index drug? Check for new excipients. Consider switching back or to a different generic brand. Document everything. Follow up in 2-4 weeks. In some cases, the prescriber may need to write "do not substitute" on the prescription.

How can specialty pharmacies improve their generics strategy?

Start by identifying top therapeutic areas with available generics or biosimilars. Standardize on one manufacturer per drug to simplify inventory and reduce confusion. Build clear substitution protocols with prescriber involvement. Train staff to educate patients upfront. Track patient outcomes after switches. Partner with a single reliable distributor to avoid supply chain chaos. And always document allergies or sensitivities to inactive ingredients.

What Comes Next?

The future of specialty pharmacy hinges on three things: better PBM policies, clearer biosimilar rules, and more pharmacist-led patient education. Until then, the best practice remains simple: don’t swap without a plan. Don’t assume bioequivalence means identical experience. And never underestimate the power of a pharmacist who takes the time to listen.

4 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Skye Kooyman

    January 27, 2026 AT 04:17

    So basically pharmacists are stuck between a rock and a hard place-patients panic over pill colors, PBMs punish them for not having generics that don’t exist, and no one listens when they say ‘this isn’t just a pill swap.’

  • Image placeholder

    John Wippler

    January 28, 2026 AT 20:41

    It’s wild how we treat medicine like a grocery store item. You don’t swap out a Stradivarius for a knockoff violin and expect the same symphony. Biosimilars? They’re like a cover band-same notes, different soul. And patients? They feel the difference even if the lab says it’s ‘equivalent.’

    We measure success in cost savings, but the real metric should be: did the person sleep better? Did their pain ease? Did they stop crying in the pharmacy aisle because they thought they got the wrong medicine?

    Generics aren’t evil. But treating them like interchangeable widgets is. It’s not about price tags-it’s about trust. And trust doesn’t come from a formulary spreadsheet. It comes from a pharmacist who remembers your name, your history, and the fact that your last switch gave you a rash and three panic calls.

    Let’s stop pretending bioequivalence = identical experience. The body doesn’t read FDA documents. It feels.

    And if PBMs want higher generic rates? Fine. But first, give us the generics. And stop penalizing us for not having magic beans we can’t grow.

    Specialty pharmacy isn’t a supply chain-it’s a lifeline. And lifelines need care, not cost-cutting algorithms.

  • Image placeholder

    Kipper Pickens

    January 30, 2026 AT 07:28

    From a pharmacoeconomic standpoint, the GDR metric is a misaligned KPI in the context of specialty pharmacy ecosystems, given the predominance of biologics and the regulatory complexity surrounding interchangeability under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). The absence of generic alternatives for a significant proportion of specialty therapeutics renders GDR a non-viable performance indicator without stratification by therapeutic class or FDA interchangeability status.

    Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic variability inherent in biosimilar manufacturing-particularly with respect to post-translational modifications-introduces non-clinical heterogeneity that may manifest as patient-reported adverse events despite statistical bioequivalence.

  • Image placeholder

    James Nicoll

    January 31, 2026 AT 04:21

    Oh so now the pharmacy is supposed to be a therapist, a chemist, a translator, and a PBM compliance officer all at once? And they get paid less than a barista? Brilliant business model. 🤡

    Next they’ll make us sign a waiver before we can buy aspirin saying ‘I understand this generic might not make me feel exactly like the brand, but I’m cool with that.’

Write a comment